PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASSAM INFORMATION COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION
Dated 12-06-2007
Name of the Complainant:
Shri Dhirendra Mallah Buzarbaruah,
General Secretary, All Assam Elementary Teacher Educators' Association, Basic
Training Centre, Nalbari.
Name of the Public Authority:
Deputy Commissioner, Nalbari.
The following were present:
1. Md. M.U. Ahmed, Public Authority
D.C., Nalbari
2. Smti Nadira Jesmin, C.O., PIO
Nalbari.
3. Shri Dhirendra Mallah Buzarbaruah,Complainant
The complainant was present. The Deputy Commissioner, Nalbari and the Circle
Officer., Nalbari were present.
Brief of the Case
One Shri Direndra Mallah Buzarbaruah submitted a petition dated 11.12.06 addressed
to the State Chief Information Commissioner stating that on 1.8.06 he submitted
a petition under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 for certain information from
the Circle Officer, Nalbari. He handed over the petition to her. But she refused
to accept the petition stating that it was wrongly addressed. He again submitted
another petition enclosing orders of the Revenue Deptt., Govt. of Assam designating
Circle Officers as the SPIO under the RTI Act on 4.9.06, the same was received
by her office. On 4.9.06 the C.O. when met by the petitioner rudely informed
that she did not receive any such petition. She insisted on another petition
a fresh with a fresh Treasury Challan of Rs.l 0/- but since he had already given
Treasury Challan, he did not want to give it afresh.
The information sought for is as follows:
He wanted a copy of the petition entered as entry no. 169 in the Receipt Register of the Circle Officer, Nalbari.
The Commission transferred the petition on 26.12.06 to the D.C., Nalbari and
directed him to furnish the information. Then the Commission received a petition
on 27.04.07 in which he stated that he forwarded the letter no. SIC.166/2006/6
dtd. 26.12.06 to the D.C., Nalbari which was received by him. He did not get
any information from the D.C., Nalbari. Hence this complaint case.
Submission of the parties
The complainant reiterated the statement made by him in the petition dtd.11.12.06.
He further stated that he gave a petition to the D.C., Nalbari on 8.12.06.
The SPIO stated that the complainant did not meet her on 1.8.06 She also said
that the complainant did not meet her on 4.9.06. She admitted that she received
the letter of the D.C., Nalbari on 8.2.07. She admitted that she made a mistake
and that she was not aware of the provisions of the RTI Act. She stated that she had brought
copies of the documents sought for by the complainant and would hand over the same to the
complainant then and there.
The Deputy Commissioner, Nalbari stated that on receipt of the notice of the
Commission he directed the C.O., Nalbari who is the SPIO for her office to provide
information pointing out in his letter to her that failure to provide information
in time will lead to penalty.
Observation by the Commission
The Commission found it extremely difficult to believe that the C.O., Nalbari
or her office did not receive the petitions. The Commission was unhappy that
the C.O., Nalbari did not furnish information. The C.O., Nalbari could not give
any suitable reply during the hearing as to why she could not furnish copy of
the documents available in her office even after the D.C., Nalbari who is her
Controlling Officer gave specific direction to her to furnish the information.
Rather, she showed an attitudinal problem in dealing with the R TI petitions.
The Commission wanted to impose penalty on her, when the D.C., Nalbari apologized
on her behalf and the complainant also did not press for imposition of the penalty.
The Commission observed that the contention of the D.C., Nalbari that he sent
the petition to the C.O., Nalbari and she should have given the reply was not
acceptable as it is the duty of the D.C., Nalbari and SPIO of his office to
ensure furnishing of the reply to the petitioner.
Decision of the Commission
1. The Commission, on careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of
the case decided not to impose any penalty on the C.O., Nalbari on the ground that she apologized
to the Commission for the delay in furnishing the information and promised that
she would deal with the RTI petitions promptly and would not show any attitudinal
problem in dealing with the members of the public and on the ground that the
complainant did not press for imposition of penalty. The Commission, however,
made it very clear that in future if there is any lapse on her part in dealing
with the RTI petitions, she will not be excused and penal action shall be taken against her
as per law.
2. The Commission also found that D.C., Nalbari had failed to act on the petition
which was submitted to his office on 8.12.06 by the petitioner. The Commission
directed him to conduct an enquiry and fix responsibility why the said petition
was not put up to him. He also did not ensure that the information was furnished
to the petitioner after the Commission transferred the petition to him which
he forwarded to the SPIO. It was also revealed that in the office of the D.C.,
Nalbari there are no notices put up to facilitate submission of the petitions
on RTI by the public. The Commission, therefore, directed the D.C., Nalbari
under Section 19(8) of the RTI Act, 2005 that he should display notice boards
in prominent places in his office and also in the offices of his subordinates
in his district the names, telephone numbers and address of the State Public
Information Officer/ Asstt. State Public Information Officer/Appellate Authority
and the place where the public can submit the petitions under the RTI Act. In
the notice, the mode of payment of the application fees should also be mentioned.
3. The Commission would like to stress the need for spreading R TI education
in the district and accordingly advised the D.C., Nalbari to organize a meeting
of the offices of his district in consultation with the State information Commissioner.
The Deputy Commissioner should send compliance report to the Commission by 4.7.2007.
Sd/- (R.S. Mooshahary)
Chief Information Commissioner, Assam
Janata Bhawan, Dispur.
Sd/- (Dr. B K Gohain)
State Information Commissioner, Assam
Janata Bhawan, Dispur.
Authenticated true copy
(Jiauddin Ahmed)
Secretary, State Information Commission, Assam
Janata Bhawan, Dispur.
CC:
1. Md. M.U. Ahmed, Deputy Commi.ssioner, Nalbari
2. Smti. Nadira Jesmin, Circle Officer, Nalbari Revenue Circle, Nalbari.
3. Shri Dhirendra Mallah Buzarbaruah, General Secretary, All Assam Elementary Teachers
Educators' Association, Basic Training Centre, Nalbari
4. MD, AMTRON, Bamunimaidam for website uploading
5. Office file.
Secretary
State Information Commission, Assam